Ett företag i USA försöker sälja garanterat kolfritt socker (sic). Med grundskolekunskaper bör man inse problemet …
(Socker utan kol = vatten …, jmf. m. fotosyntesen …) Vi har liknande problem med företag i Sverige, som försöker rida på samma bluff, t.ex ”klimatsmarta” produkter. (Ex. Kungsörnen och Preem, vänligen lägg fram bevis för era påståenden! Att hänvisa till någon politisk organisation med agenda och skrivbordsproduker som ”bevis” duger inte …)
#120dB
Senaste kommentarer
Besökare kommer ifrån:
Words of Wisdom
“…we should recognise that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.”
– IPCC TAR Chap 14, Exec Summary
"In general we look for a new law by the following process. First we guess it. Then we compute the consequences of the guess to see what would be implied if this law that we guessed is right. Then we compare the result of the computation to nature, with experiment or experience, compare it directly with observation, to see if it works. If it disagrees with experiment it is wrong. In that simple statement is the key to science. It does not make any difference how beautiful your guess is. It does not make any difference how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is – if it disagrees with experiment it is wrong. That is all there is to it."
Richard Phillips Feynman, 1918-1988
“It is difficult to get a man to understand something if his salary depends upon his not understanding it.”
Upton Sinclair, 1878-1968
SasjaL 
Cowspiracys lögner om vattenförbrukning för kött skjutna i sank
GillaGilla